Literal Understanding of Genesis 1-2

Image result for literal creationism
Some basic reasons why I believe God created the earth in six, normal, 24-hour days.

1.  This is just a plain reading of the Biblical texts without any reasons to believe they should be interpreted otherwise.

2.  Each of the six successive days includes a specific number for the day (Gen 1: 5, 8, 13, 19, 23, 31).

3. Each of these same six successive days includes a time cycle reference, "the evening and the morning" (Gen 1:5, 8, 13, 19, 23, 31).

4. In God's giving of the Ten commandments (Ex 20), the fourth commandment "Remembering the Sabbath" explicitly references a six-day creation event.  The Sabbath is actually a seventh day of the regular calendar week.  No different in length than the other six days.

5. Alternative conclusions for taking Gen 1-2 as non-literal, non-24-hr days, either directly or covertly are based on a false theory of evolution.  Obviously this is not scriptural authority but a compromise with unbelieving scientists.  These scientific theories confuse observational and historical science.

6. On a technical level, the underlying Hebrew text identifies Gen 1-2 as historical narrative.  This is based on the Hebrew waw-consecutive structure.  It appears most noticeably in the KJV text starting each line with the word "and."  This Hebrew structure is not poetic literature such as the book of Psalms.  I must admit as of today, I have not yet verified whether all 150 Psalms appear as poetry and not as historical narrative.  One day I will have all 150 completed with "observed" data.

I am not here discussing the eternal destiny of those who I believe have compromised on their interpretation of the Biblical account of creation.

I am not aware as of yet, any part of the gospel content requiring believing in a literal creation.  However, it is strangely inconsistent to believe in a literal second Adam (Rom 5; 1 Cor 15) who died a sacrificial death on a cross for the sins of a first Adam who may not have really existed (Gen 1-2).  Jesus himself took them as historical people in his comments on marriage (Mt 5).

I would also suggest it presents an inconsistent picture of Biblical Christianity to claim Genesis does not matter.

Below are several short booklets helpful in understanding Genesis without evolutionary compromise:

A Pocket Guide to ... A Young Earth.  Evidence that supports the biblical perspective. (Answers in Genesis: Petersburg, KY), 2010.

A Pocket Guide to ... The Global Flood. A biblical and scientific look at the catastrophe that changed the earth (Answers in Genesis: Petersburg, KY), 2009.

A Pocket Guide to ... Six Days. How long were the days in Genesis 1? (Answers in Genesis: Petersburg, KY), 2014.


No comments:

Some Translation Traditions are Hard to Break (Test Case: Romans 1:3 "Jesus Christ Our Lord" in the KJV 1611)

 Some Translation Traditions are Hard to Break  (Test Case: Romans 1:3 "Jesus Christ Our Lord") If you've every bothered to re...