Showing posts with label Liberal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal. Show all posts

Friday, December 9, 2016

My Plea for Christian Conservatives to be Consistent (Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act)

Image result for national concealed carry bill

My Plea for Conservatives and Even Christians for Consistency towards the Government

Some will do doubt not like what I am about to write.  That's okay.  I am concerned that Christians and (adjectival) Conservatives be consistent.

Christians have an obligation toward the government.  Obey and pray for them.  If you're not being forced to actually sin or actively endorse sin or any manifestations of it then you should be obeying the laws of the land.  The other is simple: pray for your leaders in government (Rom 13, 1 Tim 2).

Now to the main subject--Federal government designed concealed carry permits for the entire country.  See a copy of the article online here: Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act.  Yes every state will once again have to bow down to the laws made by big brother government.  This is good right?  (Oh, by the way I am a concealed carry permit holder in my own state).  So it's okay to make laws as long as I agree with the agenda, right?

Is it the governments job to tell the states what is right and what is evil?  The question is not whether you can carry your concealed firearm in your own state.  The question is not what reciprocity exists between your state and the ones around it.  The question: Should the government make (even more) laws that tell every state what they can and cannot do?  If the conservatives can do it now then don't complain when liberals do it too (or in the past).  Be consistent.

Step back in time before you answer that question.

I ask my Christian conservative friends the following questions:

1. What is/was DOMA?  Refresher in case you forgot.  Defense of Marriage Act.  The government defined what is a legal marriage.  All the states fell in line.  So when this law made by the government ceased to exist what was your response?  Were you upset, cheering, or sad?  Don't forget big brother government and the Supreme Court forced all the states to comply.

2. What is/was Common Core or even No Child Left behind?  Educators speak up if you remember.  Who designed these for state compliance?  Who made certain scores necessary for federal financial aid?  Whether you like it or not, is this the government's business telling your state what they can or cannot do with education?  Be consistent.

3.  What is/will be the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act?  Again, I'm not asking what your own state allows (remember I have a concealed carry for my own state).  Whoever else acknowledges this up to those states.  It is not mandates by law from big brother government.  So is it good or evil?  Is this yet another place where the government is telling you exactly what you can or cannot do?  You decide.
At least be consistent.

I'm not asking you to be politically correct, conservative, or liberal.  What is the Biblical purpose for government?  Is it to tell all the states what they can and cannot do?

Whatever your response, especially if those decision are in your favor or not, at least be consistent.

Comments encouraged.  Enjoy!!!

Saturday, December 3, 2016

Sad Reminder of the Situation in our Public (State) School System

Sad Reminder of the Situation in our Public (State) School System

I am so glad I am able to home school are children.  I love them and I am glad we make the sacrifices necessary to teach them and to instill in them what is required of them before a holy and loving God.
Your first responsibility is your children not your career or making a name for yourself.

I highly recommend this video for what is necessary to change the deplorable situation in our public school system.


Make the sacrifices needed to invest in and teach your children.
They are not government property.
They are your children.  It is your responsibility before God to make disciples of Christ.
Enjoy!

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

So are the police racist? Opinion of a concealed carry owner who still believes the 2nd Amendment

So are the police racist?  Opinion of a concealed carry owner who still believes the 2nd Amendment applies to me.

The police protect me.  If they are in danger I will gladly help them.  I have many friends in law enforcement.

So are police racist?  That would depend on how you define the term?  It also would depend on whether you are the family member of someone shot by police.  Also on how you define racism.  Technically there is one human race, all made in God's image.

Sadly, the big city near me is again have a trial for a police officer who shot and killed another person in the line of duty.  The police officer was white and the man shot was black.  Just as a reminder, I don not like either evolutionary based designation for individuals.  We have one creator who made all mankind in his image.  Anyway back to the farm.

Check out this video.  What do the actual facts show in relation the the ad hominem verbal thrashes by the liberals toward our public servants.  Why can't liberals just tell the truth.  Answer:  It would destroy all their name calling and social justice rhetoric.


Don't expect the liberal media like (Foxnews and CNN) to report on this one.  Sorry, Foxnews this last election as voided my respect for them and who they hire.

Enjoy!

Saturday, November 19, 2016

(DNC) is pushing for their new Head to be Radical Muslim from Minnesota (Be Informed)

emailbanner.png

9/11 Truther for DNC Chair?


keith_ellison.pngWe feel compelled to share with you, an alarming story that the mainstream media won’t, regarding a prominent candidate for DNC Chairman, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN).
If elected to this powerful position, Rep. Ellison would be the first Muslim ever to serve as DNC Chairman.
Unfortunately, this would not be the only “glass ceiling” the Congressman’s appointment would shatter.
Rep. Ellison would also be the first 9/11 truther to be given the reigns to the DNC. In other words, he implied that 9/11 was an inside job, committed by the United States Government, most notably President George W. Bush.
That’s right, a 2007 video has surfaced in which Rep. Ellison back in 2007, compares the events of 9/11 to the Reichstag fire that helped bring Adolf Hitler to power in Nazi Germany. This stunt he referenced was a ruse, designed to coalesce the will of the people around Hitler.
As the Washington Free Beacon notes, Ellison proclaimed:
“Remember 9/11. Right? You had never had all this discrimination against religious minorities but for 9/11,” Ellison said. “You had it, but you didn’t have it to the degree that we have it now. 9/11 is this juggernaut event in American history, and it allows—it’s almost like, you know, the Reichstag fire kind of reminds me of that. Does anybody know what I’m talking about?”
“But who benefited from 9/11?” an audience member asked.
“Well, I mean, you know, you and I both know,” Ellison said.
“Yeah, Bush,” the audience member replied, a clear reference to then-President George W. Bush.
“But the thing is that, you know, after the Reichstag was burned, they blamed the Communists for it, and it put the leader of that country in a position where he could basically have authority to do whatever he wanted,” Ellison said.
This is a statement by a United States Congressmen, and frontrunner for DNC Chairman? All aboard the lunatic train if Ellison should be appointed.
Keith-Ellison-Muslim-RU.jpgAlso, notice how Rep. Ellison’s big takeaway from 9/11 was that it led to discrimination against Muslims. In other words, Ellison is implying that George Bush was secretly behind the events of 9/11, to give himself more power, and so that ordinary Americans would start discriminating against Muslims. Someone check the air quality in Ellison’s office…quickly!
But more striking than this insane theory propagated by a potential DNC Chairman, is Ellison’s ties to radical Islamic terror networks.
Ellison is an enthusiastic supporter of CAIR, a Muslim Brotherhood front group, classified by the United Arab Emirates as a terrorist organization.
Think about that, even a country like the U.A.E that has Sharia law thinks CAIR is dangerously radical!
More to it, Ellison was a spokesman for the Nation of Islam well into his 30’s, a notoriously hateful and anti-Semitic organization.
Ellison also knowingly accepted $50,000 in campaign contributions from Islamic radicals, who openly supported Islamic terrorism and were leaders of front groups for Hamas and other Islamic terror networks.
It wouldn’t just be insane to elect Ellison as DNC Chairman, it would be dangerous.
For Freedom,

ACT for America

Friday, November 18, 2016

What do the Numbers really tell us? Why do Liberals keep saying "Majority" "Democracy" and "Popular Vote"?

Image result for california wants to leave us

What do the Numbers really tell us?  Why do Liberals keep saying "Majority" "Democracy" and "Popular Vote"?  Why do Liberals in California want to leave?

What do the numbers really tell us?  What don't the democrats and liberals every really say?

Let's look at the numbers.

Based on last polls I saw (without Michigan of course).  Obviously, polls really don't want to show how bad Clinton really lost.

Totals: Trump 60,963,480 and Clinton 62,020,451.
Also, based on counties.  Trump won 3084 of 3141 total US counties.  So I guess he won the majority of counties (just not the counties with lots of illegals and minority voters).

The liberals hate this idea.  They only want to count the millions of extra votes in the big cities.  But in total barely enough to make for what Clinton won in CA alone.  This is why they must continue to rant on total numbers.

So technically if Californian wants to leave the USA, then let them go!!!  The Democrats will always lose future elections.  She would have lost over 5 million votes.  No more "majority" "democratic" votes to whine about any more.  Republican landslide.
Let them leave.  Future Result: Republican victory.

President Obama won California in both 2008 and 2012.
President Bush lost Californian in both 2000 and 2004 (and still one the election).
President Clinton won California in both 1992 and 1996.
So out of the the pass SEVEN presidential elections, Republicans have lost California.
Gotta wonder about the value of California.

So let's do the math.  How much more did she have in the popular vote (counting votes)?
My math shows she only had  1,056, 971 more votes.  But lost the electoral college by a massive landslide.

So let's compare the numbers liberals never talk about.
If you look at California alone, Clinton won by roughly 2.2 million votes.  So what does that say for the other 49 states of the Unites States of America.  Trump had more votes without CA.

Let's look even closer about this state making headlines wanting to leave the US.

Both republicans and democrats combined for a little over 10.5 million votes.
So what is California's actual population?   As of last count (2014) CA had roughly 38.8 million residents.  Look at the numbers.  Less than one third CA population actually voted for either candidate (combined).  To be fair there are only 17.9 million registered voters in Californian.  So a little over half voted.

Who would leave the country?  Liberals or Conservatives.  Let them leave.  The Conservatives will move and stay in the country to help ensure future Conservative victories.

How many years now has Texas tried to leave???

Kind of leaves you wondering how many of these millions of disgruntled and winy liberal, feminist democrats are causing the "I want to leave the US" rant in the news.  Let them leave.

How many do you actually think would actually show up to vote for this silly idea?

Probably not the nicest liberal-friendly "politically correct" article, but sometimes the facts hurt.
I would definitely suggest it would create more hurdles to evangelism and/or missions.

Enjoy.

Thursday, November 17, 2016

Who are the real political and Actual Racists? Republicans or Democrats? Look at the Actual Facts Not NPR Whining.

Who are the "Real" Racists?  Conservatives or Liberals?

Again as in many other areas of life.  Who defines the terms people are accused of believing?
Who defines what is "racism"?  Obviously the one who wants to accuse the opponent of violating their own definition of the term.

Affirmative Action, Voter ID, and School Vouchers.  Who really makes policies damaging and defining these areas?  It might surprise you.

These topics and more are discussed.  Once again a wonderful video worth your time viewing.



Enjoy!  Educate yourself.

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

What Democrats who cry "Democracy" and "Majority" Don't want you to know about the top 5 Issues facing Black Americans

What Democrats who cry "Democracy" and "Majority" Don't want you to know about the top 5 Issues facing Black Americans

Disclaimer concerning video:

1.  I would recommend from a Biblical basis that the top issue facing any person is their individual standing with their Creator.  Specifically, their relationship with him through the shed blood of his son, Jesus Christ by faith alone.
2.  I disagree with the use of the term "race."  I would suggest the Bible teaches we are all one "human" race.  The global flood killed all but eight.  We all have a common genetic past.  Skin tones, pigments and other issues are easily explained through the Tower of Babel and geographic isolation and reproduction.
3.  Other than these concerns, I think the following issues concerning black Americans is spot on.  I wish more Christians would take note.  Some facts are not always politically correct.



Educate yourself!!
Enjoy.





Tuesday, November 15, 2016

National Popular Vote (NPV) is an Anti-Constitutional evil Our Founders Fought Against and Liberals are fighting for.

The National Popular Vote (NPV) initiative is an Anti-Constitutional evil our Founders fought against.

This is why we have an Electoral College system (watch the video below).
Once again another factual honest presentation of the conservative truth.

Ten states have passed it as law within their own boarders: HI, IL, MD, MA, NJ, WA, VT, CA, RI, and NY.  And of course liberal DC passed it too.

How did all these states vote in the last presidential election (last week)?  I'm glad you asked this question.

THEY ALL VOTED FOR THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE HILLARY CLINTON.

These liberals want the big city states with big populations to control the country.
The small guy blue collar worker will be ignored for the big city votes.  Educate yourself.  Rule by the mob always fails.  Democracy is not the savior of the world.  Please note the ever-repeating rhetoric by the liberal left.  Their repeating buzz words (not post-election) "democracy" and "majority."  These words keep showing up in speeches and on news websites.


Another wonder video from www.pragerU.com

They fought against us being ruled by the mob.  This country is not a democracy.  Don't listen to the Liberal bias.  We are a Republic which needs Law and Order.

Listen to the repeated speeches: "democracy" and "majority" over and over again.  This is what they want you to believe.  The Liberals want you to think this.  They are wrong.  They want to change our constitution to reflect their views.

They are intent on destroying our country.

Educate yourself.  Enjoy!!!



Sunday, November 13, 2016

Here's What the Liberals and Feminists Don't want you to know about the Electoral College

Why the Electoral College System of our Country's Founders is so important and why a majority rule (democracy) will never work.




This as many other wonderful (fact-filled) videos are available at www.prageru.com.

Others have posted this link.  But taking into consideration the liberal, feminist left-wing is petitioning to overturn the election results and to strong arm and threaten the upcoming electoral college vote this even more important.


Educate yourself and Enjoy!


Some Translation Traditions are Hard to Break (Test Case: Romans 1:3 "Jesus Christ Our Lord" in the KJV 1611)

 Some Translation Traditions are Hard to Break  (Test Case: Romans 1:3 "Jesus Christ Our Lord") If you've every bothered to re...